July 14, 2024 The European Commission has accused Elon Musk’s social media platform X, formerly Twitter, of deceiving users and violating EU digital content rules. These preliminary findings could lead to significant fines if the issues are not addressed.
The commission’s investigation, initiated in December 2023, focuses on X’s compliance with the Digital Services Act (DSA), which mandates social media companies to prevent illegal activities, disinformation, and ensure advertising transparency.
There are three main violations alleged but he EU:
- X allows anyone to buy a “verified” account status, regardless of authenticity. This system allegedly enables malicious actors to create fake verified accounts, deceiving users.
- X does not meet the DSA’s requirements for clear information about paid promotions and sponsored content.
- X fails to provide its public data to researchers, hindering efforts to study and mitigate misinformation and other harmful content.
EU Commissioner Thierry Breton emphasized the need for transparency and compliance with the DSA. Breton warned that if violations are confirmed, the EU will impose fines and mandate significant changes. Margrethe Vestager, the EU’s top tech regulator, reiterated that the DSA prioritizes transparency and compliance from all platforms.
Elon Musk claimed the European Commission offered X an “illegal secret deal” to censor content without public disclosure, a deal he says X rejected. Musk expressed readiness for a public court battle to expose what he perceives as unfair treatment.
Commissioner Breton denied Musk’s allegations, clarifying that the DSA allows platforms to propose commitments to settle cases, which X’s team inquired about. Breton stressed that this process is standard regulatory procedure and emphasized the rule of law.
If confirmed, X could face fines of up to 6% of its total worldwide annual turnover. This substantial financial penalty underscores the EU’s seriousness about compliance with the DSA. The European Commission’s actions reflect a broader effort to hold major tech companies accountable for managing online content and protecting users.
The DSA, effective last year, is a significant regulatory effort by the EU to control the spread of illegal and harmful content online. The Act imposes strict requirements on social media platforms to enhance transparency, prevent disinformation, and protect user data. The investigation into X is part of this broader regulatory framework aimed at ensuring a safer and more transparent online environment.
The outcome of this legal conflict will have significant implications not only for X but also for other social media platforms operating within the EU. It will set a precedent for enforcing digital content regulations and holding platforms accountable for compliance. The case highlights ongoing tensions between regulatory bodies and tech companies regarding content moderation and user protection.
