Review Of Third-Party Security Critical To Limit Attacks

August 3, 2021

Companies that lull themselves into complacency are exposed to the risk of supply chain attacks even if they have done their due diligence in assessing the security of their third-party suppliers before entering into a partnership.

Companies would typically give their third-party suppliers “the keys to their castle” after routinely reviewing the vendor’s history and systems, said Steve Turner, a New York-based Forrester analyst who studies security and risk.

Third-party vendors should be able to deal with irregular activity in their systems and have an adequate security architecture to prevent downstream effects, he added.

Hamza Siddique, head of cybersecurity at Capgemini Southeast Asia, noted that technical controls and policies from third-party vendors or supply chain partners were not always consistent with their customer’s capabilities.

This created another attack surface or an easy target in the customer’s network and could lead to risks associated with operations, compliance and brand reputation, Siddique said in an email interview.

To better mitigate such risks, he recommends a third-party risk management strategy that draws on best practices from NIST and ISO standards, including the need for regular audits, planning for third-party response to incidents, and implementing limited and restricted access mechanisms.

In addition to containment and recovery, the consulting company’s service portfolio also includes support for its customers in establishing a strategy for recognition and analysis.

The defense strategy of companies against ransomware attacks must also go beyond the mere purchase of products and deal with the configuration of the systems and their architecture.

It was stressed that third-party systems should be regularly re-evaluated or, if this were not possible, that organizations should have tools and processes in place to protect themselves against downstream attacks.

This may be more difficult for small and medium-sized enterprises that do not have the resources or know-how to do so, which typically rely on their managed service providers to provide these services.

Cyberattacks can be divided into different parts and delivered by a number of threat actors with expertise in each part of the attack. One could be instructed to build the malware while other subsidiaries focus on breaking through a network and developing the exploit.

Ransomware attacks have also evolved into multi-layered exploitation, with cybercriminals seeing data theft as more lucrative than a disruption of service.

For more information, read the original story in ZDNet.

Top Stories

Related Articles

April 1, 2026 Anthropic has inadvertently exposed the full source code of its Claude Code tool for the second time more...

April 1, 2026 Cisco suffered a cyberattack after attackers used stolen credentials from a compromised developer tool to access its more...

March 30, 2026 Google has expanded its “Results about you” tool, allowing users to remove highly sensitive personal data, including more...

March 27, 2026 Microsoft is updating GitHub Copilot to train on real-world developer interactions, expanding beyond public code datasets to more...

Picture of TND News Desk

TND News Desk

Staff writer for Tech Newsday.
Picture of TND News Desk

TND News Desk

Staff writer for Tech Newsday.

Jim Love

Jim is an author and podcast host with over 40 years in technology.

Share:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn