AI Cannot be Inventor of a Patent, Appeal Court Rules

The Court of Appeal has ruled against Stephen Thaler in his case against the U.K. Intellectual Property Office (IPO) that AI cannot be the inventor of new patents.

Thaler had asked the IPO to grant Dabus, an artificial intelligence that he filed in 2018, the rights to two patents, one for a kind of food container and the other for a flashing light.

While the IPO initially required Thaler to name a real person as the inventor of the patents, the authority later withdrew the patent after Thaler failed to follow instructions.

The U.K. panel’s ruling states that an inventor must be a genuine human being under UK law. Lady Justice Elizabeth Laing, one of the judges involved in the decision, “Only a person can have rights. A machine cannot. A patent is a statutory right and it can only be granted to a person.”

For more information, read the original story in the BBC.

Top Stories

Related Articles

June 20, 2024 Target is introducing a new generative artificial intelligence tool aimed at enhancing the efficiency of its store employees more...

June 13, 2024 Generative AI tools are transforming the coding landscape, making both skilled and novice developers more efficient. However, the more...

May 16, 2024 Microsoft's ambitious strides in AI technology are now posing a significant challenge to its own climate goals, as more...

May 15, 2024 Ilya Sutskever, co-founder and chief scientist of OpenAI, has officially announced his departure from the company. This move more...

Jim Love

Jim Is and author and pud cast host with over 40 years in technology.