Meta sued over alleged profits from scam advertising on Facebook

April 22, 2026 Meta Platforms is facing a class action lawsuit in Washington, D.C., alleging the company knowingly profited from scam advertising on Facebook while misleading users about its efforts to combat fraud. The complaint claims internal projections tied billions of dollars in revenue to high-risk ads, raising questions about whether enforcement practices conflicted with business incentives.

The lawsuit, filed by Tech Justice Law and Tycko & Zavareei LLP on behalf of the Consumer Federation of America and Washington, D.C. consumers, alleges that Meta “systematically deceived” users under the D.C. Consumer Protection Procedures Act. “Meta has, as a matter of company policy, deliberately profited from rampant, inexcusable harm to users on its platforms,” said Sarah Kay Wiley, attorney and managing director at Tech Justice Law.

According to the complaint, internal Meta documents projected that roughly 10 per cent of the company’s annual revenue in 2024 – about $16 billion – would come from advertising tied to scams or banned goods. The filing further alleges that users are exposed to an estimated 15 billion “higher risk” scam advertisements daily across Meta’s platforms.

The suit claims Meta did not simply fail to prevent these ads but instead allowed them to persist as part of its revenue model. It alleges that high-risk advertisers were charged premium rates, increasing profits while maintaining access to users. Internal policies cited in the complaint reportedly limited enforcement actions that would reduce revenue by more than 0.15 per cent, while 96 per cent of valid user reports of fraud were allegedly ignored or rejected each week.

The complaint also alleges that Meta manipulated its public Ad Library database to present cleaner results to regulators, describing this as part of a broader “global playbook” to manage scrutiny. Plaintiffs are seeking damages, restitution of alleged profits, and an injunction to prevent further misleading practices.

The case adds to ongoing scrutiny of how large platforms balance content moderation with advertising revenue. For tech operators, it highlights the operational tension between enforcing trust and safety at scale and maintaining growth in ad-driven business models.

These claims remain allegations and have not been proven in court. We will be seeking comments from Meta and will update this story when and if they are received.



Top Stories

Related Articles

June 26, 2026 Polaroid has launched a new advertising campaign criticizing data centre water consumption as concerns about the environmental more...

June 26, 2026 Opposition to large-scale data centre developments tied to the artificial intelligence boom is beginning to influence U.S. more...

June 26, 2026 Ford Motor Co. turned to veteran engineers to tackle persistent vehicle quality problems after finding that artificial more...

June 26, 2026 Meta's chief technology officer says employee morale has fallen to one of the lowest levels in the more...

Picture of Mary Dada

Mary Dada

Mary Dada is the associate editor for Tech Newsday, where she covers the latest innovations and happenings in the tech industry’s evolving landscape. Mary focuses on tech content writing from analyses of emerging digital trends to exploring the business side of innovation.
Picture of Mary Dada

Mary Dada

Mary Dada is the associate editor for Tech Newsday, where she covers the latest innovations and happenings in the tech industry’s evolving landscape. Mary focuses on tech content writing from analyses of emerging digital trends to exploring the business side of innovation.

Jim Love

Jim is an author and podcast host with over 40 years in technology.

Share:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn