May 4, 2026 The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has introduced new eligibility rules that exclude AI-generated performances and screenplays from Oscar consideration. Acting roles must be demonstrably performed by humans with their consent, and scripts must be human-authored to qualify for awards.

The changes, announced ahead of the 99th Oscars scheduled for early 2027, formalise how generative AI can and cannot  factor into award recognition. While films can still use AI in production, those elements will not be eligible for acting or writing honours, effectively drawing a boundary between AI-assisted filmmaking and award-worthy creative work.

The update follows growing industry tension around synthetic performances and AI-assisted storytelling. Recent examples include the use of an AI-generated likeness of Val Kilmer in an upcoming film, as well as broader experimentation with virtual performers. These developments have pushed Hollywood institutions to clarify where authorship and performance begin and end in an AI-influenced production pipeline.

Under the new rules, the Academy can also request detailed disclosures about how AI was used in a film, including verification of human authorship and performance. This adds a compliance layer for studios and producers, particularly as generative tools become more embedded in workflows across writing, editing and post-production.

The policy does not yet extend to all categories. Areas such as visual effects, costume design and music remain without explicit AI-related eligibility standards, though the Academy’s move on acting and writing establishes an early framework that other categories and awards bodies may follow.

The decision builds on broader labour concerns that have shaped the industry in recent years, particularly around protecting creative roles from automation. By tying eligibility directly to human contribution, the Academy is reinforcing authorship as a central criterion for recognition, even as production tools evolve.